A common blooper is putting obviously unfinished pages on the Web. In some cases, sites were knowingly put online while still under construction. In other cases, content is missing because of an oversight: developers failed to check all the pages before taking the site live. Sites that are obviously incomplete make a poor impression on prospective customers.
Call up any Web-search engine and search for "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet" (including the quotation marks). Depending on the search engine, the search will return at least hundreds of hits, if not thousands. For example, conducting this search on Google.com yielded more than ten pages of hits.
What does this mean? Many website designers initially mock-up their websites with pseudo-Latin text so they can determine and evaluate the layout before the actual content is written . Some web-development tools help by providing the Latin filler. The most common Latin filler begins "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit...". When this text appears in a live website, it means that the designer neglected to replace the filler text with real content-text before putting the site on the Web. Vincent Flanders first called attention to this common problem in 1998 in his website WebPagesThatSuck.com.
For example, International Wafer Service, a supplier of silicon wafers, has a "What's New" page on its website that includes an announcement of improved chip-lithography methods (see below). The announcement begins normally but degenerates into filler text, including fake Latin.
Finding oneself staring at pseudo-Latin is not the only clue that a website is unfinished. Sometimes the clue is more of a Zen experience: pages of nothing. An excellent example of nothing is provided by the Continuing Studies sub-site of Stanford University's website (see below).
It is a bad idea to put a site online with clearly unfinished content. It makes your organization look amateurish and disorganized. Instead, do the following: